🔗 Share this article

Transpired he was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. Survive a decisive continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position largely to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Regarding Formation and Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director who having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to ditch his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

The Ultimate Authority In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Football Order: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and see their vision through to completion. But how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss him for playing too much that system. Bring in the project manager and later discard him for taking excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.